Describe the facts, get Supreme Court rulings that fit — every match explained. Save what you'll cite. Add the client, the pleadings, and the drafts. Come back weeks later and pick up where you left off.
Legal AI has settled into a shape: a chat box that summarizes rulings and asks you to trust the summary. That is not what a lawyer needs at 11pm before a filing. A lawyer needs to know which rulings match the facts, which passages actually say what the tool claims they say, and where each ruling parts ways with the matter at hand.
And a lawyer needs somewhere for the matter to live between sessions. Not a chat history that scrolls away. Not a Google Drive folder that has to be rebuilt for every client. A caseload — with the client on top, the matter under the client, and the rulings, the drafts, and the pleadings under the matter.
JuriClerk is built around both. Ask it about a fact pattern and it returns the rulings that fit — five at a time — each one explained by the overlap of facts, issues, and outcome, each quote verbatim from the ruling. Save what you'll cite. File the pleadings, the exhibits, the IDs. Compose a draft from the rulings you saved. Come back weeks later and everything is where you left it.
A precedent that is decisive for a resignation case may be marginal for a redundancy case. JuriClerk scores every ruling against your specific facts, on every search. No pre-baked case summaries pretending to fit every matter.
JuriClerk shows how much of a match comes from fact overlap, from issue alignment, from outcome fit, from procedural posture, and from recency. When you cite the case, you already know where its authority rests.
Each match is backed by the ruling's own words, pinned to the section they came from. When you click through, the passage is highlighted in the SC decision itself. Nothing to verify by hand.
JuriClerk reads the facts and the legal issues on separate channels, tuned for legal writing. The tool finds the ruling that decides your matter, not just the ruling that repeats your phrasing.
No persona, no hedging, no "great question." JuriClerk is written the way a senior clerk speaks to a partner — briefly, and with the citation in hand.
Each result flags the facts and issues in the ruling that don't line up with your matter. You go into the citation knowing what opposing counsel will point at — before the filing goes in.
Add a client once and every matter you take on for them sits under their record. Under each matter, saved rulings, drafts, and case files stay together — so a matter you touched two months ago opens in the same state you left it.
The drafting surface reads from the matter's own list of saved rulings, not a generic corpus. Every revision is kept, so you can walk backward if a phrasing goes wrong.
Every file is encrypted at rest and stored under your account only. If your laptop dies the day of a hearing, the pleadings are still one login away. Storage on Solo starts at 1 GB per lawyer.
